Cook Hearing Ends With Tough Questions But No Judge Ruling

Summary:

Cook lawyer Abbe Lowell spent more than an hour fielding questions from the judge over what cause the president needs to fire a Fed governor and whether Trump acted on an improper pretext.

Questions about whether President Donald Trump had cause to try to push out Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook dominated a court hearing Friday, as a judge weighs whether he had proper reasons to order her removal from the US central bank.

US District Judge Jia Cobb peppered lawyers for Cook and the administration for about two hours Friday, before ending the hearing without ruling on the Fed governor’s request for a temporary order blocking Trump’s effort to oust her.. The judge, who isn’t expected to make a decision this week, didn’t indicate which way she is leaning in a landmark lawsuit that could determine the future of the Fed’s independence.

The hearing capped weeks of criticism of the Fed by the Trump administration and signaled the beginning of a pitched legal fight that is likely to land before the US Supreme Court. Cook sued after Trump moved to fire her for allegedly engaging in fraud by declaring two homes as her primary residence in separate mortgage applications. She hasn’t been charged with wrongdoing.

The judge focused in particular on Cook’s argument that being accused of wrongdoing and fired through a series of social media posts didn’t amount to proper due process under US law.

Cook lawyer Abbe Lowell spent more than an hour fielding questions from the judge over what cause the president needs to fire a Fed governor and whether Trump acted on an improper pretext. The judge also probed whether Cook received appropriate notice.

Lowell said that fraud allegations have become a “weapon of choice” for Trump as he seeks to remove officials whom he views as obstacles to his agenda. Trump’s motive, he argued, signaled he didn’t have the necessary cause to fire Cook.

Trump is not seeking a Fed governor who “has never committed an infraction in their life,” Lowell said, but one who “would lower the interest rate” to what the president “demanded.”

No Explanation

Justice Department attorney Yaakov Roth argued that Cook’s failure so far to explain the alleged mortgage discrepancies suggests she did something wrong and supports Trump’s right to remove her for cause. If there was an explanation, he said, “we would have heard it by now.”

As part of her lawsuit, Cook suggested that an unintentional “clerical error” may have been behind the mortgage filling.

Roth denied that Trump is looking to remove Cook over policy disagreements. She was appointed by former President Joe Biden and her term was set to expire in 2038. Roth also disputed the claim by Cook that Trump has violated her right to contest the claims against her.

Cook sued Trump on Thursday, arguing that his attempt to fire her was a power grab that could cause “irreparable harm” to the US economy. The president is seeking to remove her over claims by Federal Housing Finance Agency Director Bill Pulte that she lied on mortgage documents.

At the hearing, the judge said she is “uncomfortable” with Cook’s argument that she was fired on a pretext. But she said she’s also uncomfortable with Trump explicitly saying he wanted a majority on the Fed’s board and then saying “find reasons to kick all these people off so I can get my people in.”

Cobb also signaled that she is grappling with whether she has authority at all to review the legitimacy of Trump’s stated reasons for firing Cook, or if he’s entitled to wide discretion when deciding to remove someone “for cause.”

The judge is not expected to issue a ruling before at least Tuesday, when Cook’s lawyers are due to file another legal brief addressing the judge’s questions on Friday and responding to the government’s arguments.

Next Steps

In a statement Tuesday, the Fed acknowledged Cook was seeking a court order clarifying whether she could continue serving in her role while the case proceeds. The Fed said it would abide by the court’s decision, and a spokesperson added the agency would defer any decision on her work status.

Just before the hearing, the Justice Department said in a filing that courts should defer to Trump on whether he has sufficient “cause” to fire Cook. Her request for an order temporarily allowing her to remain employed should be denied, the government said. Cook is “highly unlikely to prevail on the merits” of her claim that Trump illegally fired her without cause, they argued.

“Removal for ‘cause’ is a capacious standard, and one Congress has vested in the discretion of the President,” the government said. “Even if it were subject to any judicial review — and over a century of caselaw suggests it is not — that review would have to be highly deferential, lest it intrude into the President’s constitutional authority over principal officers.”

A central claim of Cook’s lawsuit is that Trump violated her constitutional due process rights as well as the Federal Reserve Act by firing her without “cause,” a term that’s been defined to mean inefficiency; neglect of duty; and malfeasance, or wrongdoing, in office.

But the Justice Department argued that Cook was relying on an “artificially narrow interpretation” of what constitutes “cause” for her firing. In the hearing, Roth disputed Cook’s argument that she did not receive the necessary notice of the allegations against her because they were made in a social media post.

“You’re not suggesting what happened would satisfy due process requirements?” the judge asked Roth. He replied that he would.

Source: Bloomberg

Risk Warnings and Investment Disclaimers

You understand and acknowledge that there is a high degree of risk involved in trading with strategies. Following any strategies or investment methodologies is the potential for loss. The content on the site is being provided by our contributors and analysts for information purposes only. You alone are solely responsible for determining whether any trading assets, or securities, or strategy, or any other product is suitable for you based on your investment objectives and financial situation.

Quick Access to 7x24

Quick Access to More Editor-selected Real-time News

Exclusive video for free

Live Learn project team is dedicated to create exclusive videos

Real-time Quotes

View more faster market quotes

More comprehensive macro data and economic indicators

Members have access to entire historical data, guests can only view the last 4 years

Member-only Database

Comprehensive forex, commodity, and equity market data

7x24

Real-time quotes

Economic Calendar

Economic Calendar
Events
Holiday

Policy Rates

BANKS ACT (%) PREV (%) CPI (%)

Speculative Sentiment

SYMBOL

LONG SHORT

English

العربية

繁體中文

简体中文

Bahasa Melayu

Bahasa Indonesia

ภาษาไทย

Tiếng Việt

Quotes Video Analysis Data Warehouse Pro AI Signal News Economic Calendar 7x24 User Agreement Privacy Policy About Us

Risk Disclosure

The risk of loss in trading financial assets such as stocks, FX, commodities, futures, bonds, ETFs or crypto can be substantial. You may sustain a total loss of the funds that you deposit with your broker. Therefore, you should carefully consider whether such trading is suitable for you in light of your circumstances and financial resources.

No consideration to invest should be made without thoroughly conduct your own due diligence, or consult with your financial advisors. Our web content might not suit you, since we have not known your financial condition and investment needs. It is possible that our financial information might have latency or contains inaccuracy, so you should be fully responsible for any of your transactions and investment decisions. The company will not be responsible for your capital lost.

Without getting the permission from the website, you are not allow to copy the website graphics, texts, or trade marks. Intellectual property rights in the content or data incorporated into this website belongs to its providers and exchange merchants.

Recent Searches

Trending Searches

News