Western Software Still Embedded In Core Operations
Despite repeated declarations from Moscow about achieving technological self-reliance, the majority of Russian businesses continue to depend on foreign-developed software for essential operations. Recent data show that over 70% of companies still use Western platforms to run enterprise management systems, customer databases, logistics networks, and industrial design workflows.
Many firms continue to operate systems such as SAP for logistics and supply chain management, Microsoft SQL Server for data infrastructure, and Adobe software for design and marketing. Sanctions have made it increasingly difficult to legally update these platforms or renew licenses, yet companies remain locked in due to the absence of credible substitutes.
This persistence highlights a structural dependency rather than a temporary adjustment issue. The reliance reflects how deeply embedded these systems are in business processes, making rapid replacement impractical even under sustained political pressure.
Limits Of Domestic Alternatives Become Clear
Russian authorities frame technological self-sufficiency as a strategic priority, but domestic software providers have struggled to meet the demands of complex industries. Local solutions have shown some capability in basic areas such as office software and simple accounting tools, yet they fall short in advanced fields like semiconductor design, cloud infrastructure, and high-end CAD systems.
Replacing mature Western software involves more than rewriting code. It requires rebuilding entire ecosystems, including third-party extensions, integration capabilities, training pipelines, and experienced specialist communities. This gap explains why many Russian firms test domestic products only in non-critical areas while keeping Western software at the core of their operations.
The continued prioritization of performance and reliability over political alignment illustrates a clear correlation between operational risk and software choice. Companies facing high costs of failure are more likely to tolerate regulatory pressure than jeopardize system stability.
Sanctions Create A Growing Technology Debt
Sanctions have not triggered an immediate collapse of Russia’s IT systems, but they have created what analysts describe as an accumulating technology debt. As Western vendors withdraw official support, companies are forced to rely on outdated versions, unofficial patches, or legal gray zones to keep systems running.
This situation raises cybersecurity risks, weakens compatibility with global partners, and complicates international collaboration. Over time, maintenance costs rise while system efficiency declines, gradually widening the productivity gap between Russian firms and global competitors. The relationship here is cumulative rather than sudden, with long-term erosion replacing short-term disruption.
How Companies Are Coping In Practice
To maintain operations, many Russian firms have turned to parallel imports through third countries or contracted domestic integrators to sustain legacy systems. Others comply formally with state directives by adopting Russian platforms in peripheral functions, while continuing to rely on Western software for mission-critical activities.
This dual-system approach reflects caution rather than confidence. The fact that dependency remains above 70% suggests that pilot projects and partial transitions have not yet demonstrated sufficient reliability to justify full-scale migration.
Digital Sovereignty As A Long-Term Challenge
For the Russian government, technological independence is framed as an issue of national security and strategic power. However, the persistence of Western software across key sectors shows that deeply embedded systems cannot be replaced through administrative mandates alone.
If sanctions tighten further or informal access channels are disrupted, sectors such as banking, energy, and heavy industry could face serious operational strain. In this context, the continued reliance of more than 70% of Russian enterprises on Western software stands out as a strategic weakness that is likely to shape the country’s economic and technological trajectory for years to come.