News
7x24
Quotes
Economic Calendar
Video
Data
- Names
- Latest
- Prev.
Latest Update
Risk Warning on Trading HK Stocks
Despite Hong Kong's robust legal and regulatory framework, its stock market still faces unique risks and challenges, such as currency fluctuations due to the Hong Kong dollar's peg to the US dollar and the impact of mainland China's policy changes and economic conditions on Hong Kong stocks.
HK Stock Trading Fees and Taxation
Trading costs in the Hong Kong stock market include transaction fees, stamp duty, settlement charges, and currency conversion fees for foreign investors. Additionally, taxes may apply based on local regulations.
HK Non-Essential Consumer Goods Industry
The Hong Kong stock market encompasses non-essential consumption sectors like automotive, education, tourism, catering, and apparel. Of the 643 listed companies, 35% are mainland Chinese, making up 65% of the total market capitalization. Thus, it's heavily influenced by the Chinese economy.
HK Real Estate Industry
In recent years, the real estate and construction sector's share in the Hong Kong stock index has notably decreased. Nevertheless, as of 2022, it retains around 10% market share, covering real estate development, construction engineering, investment, and property management.
Market Trend
Popular Indicators
AI Signal
View All

No data

Sign in
Sign up
--

Reminders Temporarily Unavailable




Trump considered direct payments to Greenlanders for US annexation, a strategic bid strongly opposed by leaders.
The Trump administration explored a plan to offer Greenlanders direct cash payments of up to $100,000 per person to encourage them to vote to secede from Denmark and join the United States, according to four sources familiar with the discussions.

While the exact logistics remain unclear, U.S. officials and White House aides reportedly floated figures ranging from $10,000 to $100,000 for each of the island's 57,000 residents. At the high end, the move would cost nearly $6 billion—a figure comparable to the combined annual U.S. aid to Israel and Egypt.
Sources indicated that while internal discussions about payments were not new, they had gained significant traction, with the $100,000-per-person figure emerging as a real possibility. However, the proposal lacked clear details on how or when the money would be distributed.
The payment strategy was just one of several options considered by the White House for acquiring Greenland. Officials also discussed military intervention and a diplomatic purchase, despite Copenhagen’s firm insistence that the territory is not for sale.
Another path under review was a "Compact of Free Association" (COFA). This type of agreement, which the U.S. has previously established with nations like Micronesia, the Marshall Islands, and Palau, would involve the U.S. government providing essential services and military protection. In return, the U.S. would gain the ability to operate freely in the territory and secure favorable trade terms. For this to happen, Greenland would first need to become independent from Denmark.
One source noted that White House aides were keen to build on the momentum from the recent operation that led to the capture of Venezuelan leader Maduro and his wife.
President Trump publicly outlined several reasons for his interest in Greenland, framing the acquisition as a matter of national security and geopolitical influence.
His administration's key arguments included:
• National Security: Trump emphasized the island's strategic location, telling reporters, "We need Greenland from the standpoint of national security, and Denmark isn't going to be able to do it."
• Mineral Resources: The territory is rich in minerals considered vital for military applications.
• Regional Dominance: The move was seen as a way to solidify Washington's geopolitical influence in the Western Hemisphere.
"It's so strategic," Trump stated while aboard Air Force One.
The proposal was met with swift and unified opposition from Greenlandic and European leaders. Greenland's Prime Minister, Jens-Frederik Neilsen, dismissed the idea in a Facebook post, stating, "Enough is enough... No more fantasies about annexation."
European allies also pushed back forcefully. In a joint statement, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain, the United Kingdom, and Denmark declared that only Greenland and Denmark have the authority to decide the island's future.

Quick Access to 7x24
Quick Access to More Editor-selected Real-time News

Exclusive video for free
FastBull project team is dedicated to create exclusive videos

Real-time Quotes
View more faster market quotes

More comprehensive macro data and economic indicators
Members have access to entire historical data, guests can only view the last 4 years

Member-only Database
Comprehensive forex, commodity, and equity market data



